再會長江

3.3 播放：75萬 更新：2026-04-24
主演：竹內亮 

十年前，竹內亮導演在NHK拍攝紀錄片《長江天地大紀行》時留下了一個遺憾：未能拍攝到“長江源頭的第一滴水”。十年后，遷居中國南京的他決心彌補這一遺憾。經過兩年的精心準備，他在2021年再次踏上了6300公里的長江之旅，與舊友們重逢。竹內亮的鏡頭下，不僅有壯美的自然風光，更有普通百姓的樸實笑容和令人潸然淚下的動人故事。他捕捉了長江沿岸的風土人情和百姓的真實生活，展現了中國經濟騰飛后的十年巨變。作為在中國生活近十年的外國人，竹內亮導演在完成十年之約的同時，也希望讓世界看到真實的中國人、真實的中國。電影版由竹內導演的重新剪輯，將帶給觀眾全新的視聽體驗。

播放通道

詳細簡介

十年前，竹內亮導演在NHK拍攝紀錄片《長江天地大紀行》時留下了一個遺憾：未能拍攝到“長江源頭的第一滴水”。十年后，遷居中國南京的他決心彌補這一遺憾。經過兩年的精心準備，他在2021年再次踏上了6300公里的長江之旅，與舊友們重逢。竹內亮的鏡頭下，不僅有壯美的自然風光，更有普通百姓的樸實笑容和令人潸然淚下的動人故事。他捕捉了長江沿岸的風土人情和百姓的真實生活，展現了中國經濟騰飛后的十年巨變。作為在中國生活近十年的外國人，竹內亮導演在完成十年之約的同時，也希望讓世界看到真實的中國人、真實的中國。電影版由竹內導演的重新剪輯，將帶給觀眾全新的視聽體驗。

同類推薦

七月寒潮

邁克爾·C·豪爾,山姆·夏普德,唐·約翰遜,凡妮莎·肖,懷亞特·拉塞爾

　　出于自衛，理查德射殺了侵入自己家中的陌生人。但是他不得不面對死者父親的殘忍報復。然而不久，敵對雙方就發現事實并不像表面展現的那么簡單，他們不得不聯合起來面對黑暗的真相。

天啟四騎士

丹尼斯·奎德,章子怡,盧·泰勒·普奇,小克利夫頓·克林斯

　　蘭斯林（丹尼斯·奎德 Dennis Quaid 飾）警官同時也是一個單身父親，因公務繁忙，他無暇照顧兩個兒子，大兒子亞歷克斯無形中時常扮演父親的角色。最近蘭斯林被一樁連續殺人案纏住，每個兇案現場都發現了至少四名嫌疑人的蹤跡，并且統一留下了“過來看”的血色留言，死者死于懸掛的狀態充滿了宗教意味，蘭斯林從人體懸掛的鐵架入手，發現這一干罪犯以殺人作為宗教儀式，并且以啟示錄中記載的“天啟四騎士”自居。第一個受害者的華裔養女克里斯?。ㄕ伦逾?飾）主動找到蘭斯林，坦承了自己與連續殺人案的關系，但是這不能阻止更多人受害，蘭斯林驚見自己最不愿意看到的事情發生了……

天出血

常戎,蓋麗麗,于紹康,楊兆泉,洪濤

 沙漠里流傳著一句話：天出血，人死絕。故事發生在舊時代的西北，這樣一片沙漠地帶，它講述了一個愛情悲劇故事。年青的問九因鄉鄰間缺水爭執而出逃在外，待回來時，曾與之心心相印的秀秀姑娘已被族叔迎娶，成了他的嬸嬸。水繼續威脅著人們的生存，問九的族叔為富不仁，竟以空手能否從滾開的油鍋里撈起銅錢來決定人們在綠洲的去留，他狠毒地騙問九替他撈起銅錢卻又暗地加害問九。問九奮起抗爭，砍死了族叔，被官府捉捕。牢獄未能囚住問九渴求自由的心。他一次次尋求機會越獄。數十年后，當問九逃出虎口，卻又被沙漠里的土匪抓住逼他帶路，對秀秀的愛情支撐著問九最后的生命，他再次出逃，掙扎著爬回自己的故鄉。但黃沙已無情地吞噬了這里的一切，唯有刻著綠洲村的石柱還未被淹沒。問九手撫石柱瞑目在這荒原上?；脑?，彩霞滿天。天出血，人死絕。

瘋狂舞蹈辦公室

廉惠蘭,崔成恩,崔乂園,樸浩山,白賢鎮,安桐丘,尹善賢,申藝燦

講述了獨自撫養女兒的公務員國熙相信完美主義是在世界上生存的唯一出路，命運般地遇到弗拉門戈舞而展開的故事。

等待方舟

耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾

　　Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.　　Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?　　n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.　　What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.　　On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.　　One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.　　Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.